Thursday, September 23, 2010

the Koreas, Japan, the US & Hofstede

(conclusion, part five. parts of the larger work have been reworked. If there is an interest in viewing the final work in whole please comment with your e-mail. As always, clicking on the image enlages it.)

USA
   One of the inherent challenges when doing a compare and contrast, and including one's own country, is the degree to which it highlights the foreignness of the other countries. A natural intimacy of one's own country immediately becomes apparent. Therefore, this statement is an acknowledgment of an unequal perception.
   There is a wide variety of impacts on the direction and movement of business in general and managerial styles in particular that has been affecting the US. Globalization certainly is among them. As alluded to earlier, the academic writings that are spearheading new directions, in large measure, are moving from left to right brain considerations.
   There was a time when one could draw a caricature of American business, all suits, 9-to-5, secretaries, Monday through Friday, built-in benefits. The predictability of business, intact a mere 50 years ago, is gone.
   What has remained, relatively speaking, within the same range is the more intimate portrait of Hofstede’s Dimensions of Culture. Americans do not tend to genuflect to their superiors, and our relatively low power distance ranking continues to reflect that. The Darwinian consideration that the pioneers or who survived continues to be reflected in our even lower uncertainty avoidance score; and certainly contributes to the US having the top score in the individualism.
   American business management, being about the business of business itself, may always find a change in fashion (the changing styles of methodologies and approaches), however, the characteristics of a given country shine through nonetheless.

Summary
   Summary suppositions start by going back to the Marshall Plan. A quick look at the Japanese Hofstede rankings, in relationship to the American rankings, finds that with the exception of individualism and LTO, Japan seems to feel compelled to have to out-American the US; clocking in within range, yet slightly higher in each other instance. Individualism being more of a Western trait and long-term orientation being more of a eastern trait.
   This would explain the higher masculinity and individualism rankings for Japan, not seen in South Korea; the East being generally considered more effeminate than the West. These rankings for South Korea are more consistent across Asia.
   It is noted that the GLOBE Project (House, R., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. , 2004) has continued Hofstede’s work. As noted in International Management (Deresky, 2008, p. 415), attributes such as charisma and autonomy have joined in being ranked; though that materially extends this paper elsewhere.

References
   Deresky, H. (2008). . In (Ed.), International Management; Managing across Borders and Cultures (6th ed, pp. 350-367). : Pearson / Prentice Hall.
   Hofstede, G. (2009). Geert Hofstede™ Cultural Dimensions. Retrieved from http://www.geert-hofstede.com/
   House, R., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. . (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations-The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA 91320: Sage Publications.
   National Public Radio. (Producer). (2010, Sept 17, 2010). Rumors Abound On Why North Korea Delay’s Meeting [audio]. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129926418
   Nirgitian, Chief of the Free World. (n.d.). North Korea Management Styles. Retrieved from
   Pascale, R., & Athos , A. (1981). The Art of Japanese Management. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Peng, M. W. (2006). Hofstede Dimensions of Culture. In (Ed.), Global Strategy. Mason, OH: Thompson South-Western.
   Peng, M. W. (2009). Top 100 Economies. In Global Business. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage learning.
   Pfeffer, J. (2007, August 15 2007: 5:40 AM EDT). Management 101: Lessons from Seoul. Business 2.0 Magazine. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/14/news/international/management_south_korea.biz2/index.htm
   U.S. ARMY CENTER OF MILITARY HISTORY. (). POLICY AND DIRECTION: THE FIRST YEAR ([uploaded unsourced book chapter]). Retrieved from : http://www.history.army.mil/books/pd-c-01.htm
   World Business Culture. (n.d.). American Management Style, South Korean Management Style and Japanese Management Style (respectively). Retrieved Sept. 18, 2010, from http://www.worldbusinessculture.com/South-Korea-Management-Style.html; http://www.worldbusinessculture.com/Japanese-Management-Style.html; http://www.worldbusinessculture.com/American-Management-Style.html
   the David M Kennedy Center for International Studies. (1997). Japan, North Korea, South Korea. In G. P. Skabelund (Ed.), Culturegrams, vol. 2; Africa, Asia, Oceania. Brigham Young University: Brigham Young University.

No comments:

Post a Comment